Automate or emigrate
Automated fiber and tape placement is not just a notion, but a real manufacturing strategy, and one being embraced by HITCO Carbon Composites.
By Donna K. Dawson, Senior Writer | March 2008
Among the myriad decisions manufacturers face today, if and how to automate production is among the biggest. In composites manufacturing, long dominated by manual production techniques, integrating automated machinery involves an expensive and daunting paradigm shift. HITCO Carbon Composites and its parent company, SGL Group – The Carbon Co. (Wiesbaden, Germany), have chosen to invest in the automation of HITCO’s composites manufacturing plant in Gardena, Calif., to position the company for significant growth in demand for composite structures. Company leaders say this is the preferred strategy, one far preferable to contracting work to offshore fabricators. The choice, says HITCO’s COO Edward Carson, was to “automate or emigrate.”
Source: Cincinnati Machine
Automated tape layup equipment can lay down multiple plies of tape in multidirectional fiber orientation over flat or minimally contoured linear tool surfaces up to 25° curvature.
It’s a choice many composite manufacturers face today as the leading airframe companies, The Boeing Co. (Seattle, Wash.) and Airbus Industrie (Toulouse, France), have committed to composites as never before, significantly increasing the material’s content in new aircraft designs and fueling the shift of companies like HITCO to automated manufacturing strategies.
Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner features the first-ever carbon fiber fuselage on a commercial jet, as well as composite wings, wingbox and tail sections. In addition, within the next few years the industry will welcome Airbus’ A350 XWB, which also promises extensive use of carbon composites in fuselage, wings and other structures. Regional jet, business jet, very light jet (VLJ) unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and rotorcraft manufacturers also are making extensive use of composites, fostering a new generation of lightweight, efficient aircraft.
The challenge facing companies like HITCO is how best to effectively and efficiently meet demand for composite structures in a demanding aerospace environment. Although many processors have elected to emigrate, retaining hand layup and relocating manufacturing operations to China, Mexico and other low-cost-labor countries, HITCO has chosen otherwise.
Source: Cincinnati Machine
Automated fiber placement system lays fiber over convex/concave curvatures or hollow shapes, around fixed or rotating tooling.
Founded by Harry I. Thompson in 1922 as the H. I. Thompson Glass and Paint Co., HITCO has maintained its Los Angeles base for 85 years, its interest in composite and insulation products since the 1950s and the HITCO name since 1966. The company is still a leader in high-temperature applications, producing materials and systems to withstand ultrahigh-temperature and fire-resistant environments. A pioneer in the development of polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based carbon fiber, the company has leveraged its knowledge of composite materials into the fabrication of high-strength, lightweight structures for aerospace, defense and commercial industries using traditional and innovative hand layup processes.
As an established Tier II aerospace and defense manufacturer, HITCO is now taking the leap to automate production processes under the leadership of SGL Group, one of the world’s leading manufacturers of carbon-based products.
Identifying the challenge
Source: HITCO
Step 1: Extensive building renovations are underway as HITCO prepares for new equipment installations.
Carson notes the necessity in composites manufacturing for a strategic operation plan and says the biggest challenge in automating airframe part manufacture is “getting a Tier I partner to sponsor qualification by a major aircraft company such as Boeing or Airbus.” A Tier II company already qualified for hand layup of parts is halfway there but must still convince its Tier I customer that automation is to its advantage. “Are you going to reduce your customer’s risk and cost?” asks Carson. The answer must be yes. “Otherwise, why should they sponsor you?” Further, a supplier contemplating investment in automation must have knowledge of composites and must have an engineering staff that can handle the complexities of tooling and part design as well as machine programming. Further, Boeing requires parts made by automation to use the same material and process specifications as those made by hand layup.
Following a strategic review of HITCO’s business, parent company SGL chose to automate HITCO’s composites manufacturing processes by renovating the entire plant and, in place of selected composite hand layup operations, installing two, and possibly three, automated tape laying (ATL) machines and one or two Viper automated fiber placement (AFP) systems built by Cincinnati Machine Composites (Hebron, Ky.). One ATL already is in position, with the second on order and the third still under consideration; one AFP has been ordered for late 2008 delivery, with an option for a second.
Carson estimates that, depending on the complexity of the part or structure, an ATL can process 25 to 45 lb/hour of carbon fiber tape and an AFP can process 15 to 25 lb/hour of carbon fiber filament, while the average hand layup technician, processes only about 2.5 lb/hour of carbon fiber material. Thus, automated systems operate 6 to 18 times faster than hand layup.
Source: HITCO
Step 2: A new cleanroom provides uncontaminated space for fabrication of fuselage floor beams until ATL equipment is fully operational.
Carson emphasizes, however, that not all hand layup was replaced, because a balance between hand layup and automation is a requisite strategy for keeping overall costs under control. In some cases, part configuration or size is not suitable for automation, and therefore hand layup secures the baseload business for a processor. A case in point is the flap track fairing that HITCO manufactures for Boeing’s 767. The fairings are canoe-shaped pods that attach to the underside of aircraft wings to cover and protect the hydraulic system that operates the flaps, spoilers and other moving parts on the wing trailing edge. HITCO will continue to hand lay up these parts because the 18 complex pieces per fairing do not lend themselves to ATL or AFP production.
Additionally, the purchase of an ATL machine, AFP machine or other major equipment requires ancillary equipment: CNC drilling and ply cutting systems, handling equipment, essential autoclave capability and more. Investment in automation depends primarily on the kinds of components and structures being built, and the overall cost for equipment can run several million dollars, Carson says.
HITCO also has added two new autoclaves (one 40 ft/12.2m long by 15 ft/4.6m high), CNC ply-cutting systems from Gerber Technology (Tolland, Conn.), a 6-axis water jet cutter from Flow International Corp. (Kent, Wash.), laser positioning systems from Virtek Vision International (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada), a hot drape former from Laminating Technology (Knighton, Powys, U.K.), an automated deltoid filler machine from Radius Engineering (Salt Lake City, Utah) and other ancillary equipment. (Deltoid filler equipment extrudes uncured prepreg in long lengths through specially shaped dies, to form, for example, a round or triangular shape.)
